We revisit the question of how capital should be taxed, arguing that if governments are allowed to use the kinds of tax instruments widely used in practice, for preferences that are standard in the macroeconomic literature, the optimal approach is to never distort capital accumulation. We show that the results in the literature that lead to the presumption that capital ought to be taxed for some time arise because of the initial confiscation of wealth and because the tax system is restricted.
- Alvarez and Atekson: The Risk of Becoming Risk Averse: A Model of Asset Pricing and Trade Volumes
- Chari: The Role of Uncertainty and Risk in Climate Change Economics
- Ayres, Garcia, Guillen, Kehoe: The Monetary and Fiscal History of Brazil, 1960-2016
- Hur, Kondo, Perri: Real Interest Rates, Inflation, and Default
- Bianchi and Mondragon: Monetary Independence and Rollover Crises
Subscribe to receive email alerts when economists from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis publish new Staff Reports, Working Papers or Economic Policy Papers. Occasionally other important news will be shared.