Before the advent of sophisticated international financial markets, a widely accepted belief was that within a monetary union, a union-wide authority orchestrating fiscal transfers between countries is necessary to provide adequate insurance against country-specific economic fluctuations. A natural question is then: Do sophisticated international financial markets obviate the need for such an active union-wide authority? We argue that they do. Specifically, we show that in a benchmark economy with no international financial markets, an activist union-wide authority is necessary to achieve desirable outcomes. With sophisticated financial markets, however, such an authority is unnecessary if its only goal is to provide cross-country insurance. Since restricting the set of policy instruments available to member countries does not create a fiscal externality across them, this result holds in a wide variety of settings. Finally, we establish that an activist union-wide authority concerned just with providing insurance across member countries is optimal only when individual countries are either unable or unwilling to pursue desirable policies.
- Ohanian, Restrepo-Echavarria, Wright: Bad Investments and Missed Opportunities? Postwar Capital Flows to Asia and Latin America
- Guvenen, Mataloni Jr, Rassier, Ruhl: Offshore Profit Shifting and Domestic Productivity Measurement
- Prescott and Wessel: Money in the Production Function
- Song, Price, Guvenen, Bloom, von Wachter: Firming Up Inequality
- Karabarbounis and Neiman: Accounting for Factorless Income
Subscribe to receive email alerts when economists from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis publish new Staff Reports, Working Papers or Economic Policy Papers. Occasionally other important news will be shared.