The standard model that economists use to analyze the impact of trade reforms systematically underpredicts changes in trade patterns. It not only underestimates overall trade magnitudes, but also fails to predict which industries experience the largest trade increases. This failure results from not accounting for rapid growth in post-liberalization trade of the products that these industries produce. This paper documents these weaknesses and demonstrates an alternative methodology. Our modified model performs better because it accounts for the rapid growth of trade in products that were traded in small quantities prior to the reduction of trade barriers. We offer a method for integrating this insight about least-traded products into the standard model and suggest that such models not only will produce more accurate predictions, but also will forecast larger welfare gains from trade liberalization.
- Ohanian, Restrepo-Echavarria, Wright: Bad Investments and Missed Opportunities? Postwar Capital Flows to Asia and Latin America
- Guvenen, Mataloni Jr, Rassier, Ruhl: Offshore Profit Shifting and Domestic Productivity Measurement
- Prescott and Wessel: Money in the Production Function
- Song, Price, Guvenen, Bloom, von Wachter: Firming Up Inequality
- Karabarbounis and Neiman: Accounting for Factorless Income
Subscribe to receive email alerts when economists from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis publish new Staff Reports, Working Papers or Economic Policy Papers. Occasionally other important news will be shared.